Prediction of Kimiko Date Krumm vs Amy Frazier Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Date Krumm vs A. Frazier

Kimiko Date Krumm
JPN
w
w
w
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
55
Age
53
-
Height
1.75m
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
4
Best Rank
13
5
Total Titles
7
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$127.4K
-
Plays
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Amy Frazier
USA
w
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
55
Age
53
-
Height
1.75m
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
4
Best Rank
13
5
Total Titles
7
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$127.4K
-
Plays
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Head-to-head: Krumm 2 - 0 Frazier
They have played 8 sets in total, with Kimiko Date Krumm winning 6 and Amy Frazier winning 2. The last match between Kimiko Date Krumm and Amy Frazier was at the Unknown Tournament, 15-04-1996, Round: F, Surface: N/A, with Kimiko Date Krumm getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Krumm | 2 |
| Frazier | 0 |
Last 4 H2H Matches:
(F) Unknown Tournament(04-15-96)
Kimiko Date Krumm
7
6
Amy Frazier
5
4
(F) Unknown Tournament(04-10-95)
Amy Frazier
7
7
Kimiko Date Krumm
6
5
(F) Tokyo Japan Open(04-04-94)
Kimiko Date Krumm
7
6
Amy Frazier
5
0
K. D. Krumm vs A. Frazier H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $127,400 |
| 70.75% (237-98) | Career Total W/L | 59.19% (480-331) |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 7 | Titles | 7 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
K. D. Krumm vs A. Frazier Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kimiko Date Krumm has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Amy Frazier has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kimiko Date Krumm, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Amy Frazier has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kimiko Date Krumm has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Amy Frazier has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kimiko Date Krumm has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Amy Frazier winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kimiko Date Krumm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 75% (W/L 107/35), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 13/8). Amy Frazier has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 75% (W/L 289/167), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 40/44).
- Player level: In the last year, Kimiko Date Krumm has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Amy Frazier has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Kimiko Date Krumm winning 3 times and Amy Frazier being victorious 1 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Kimiko Date Krumm winning 6 and Amy Frazier winning 2.
- The last match between Kimiko Date Krumm and Amy Frazier was at the Unknown Tournament, 15-04-1996, Round: F, Surface: N/A, with Kimiko Date Krumm getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kimiko Date Krumm has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Amy Frazier has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kimiko Date Krumm has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Amy Frazier has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kimiko Date Krumm has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Amy Frazier has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Kimiko Date Krumm vs Amy Frazier Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. D. Krumm vs A. Frazier H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 49 | Games Won | 35 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 75% (3/4) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Krumm 0%, Frazier 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Krumm 0%, Frazier 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Krumm 0%, Frazier 0%.
K. D. Krumm Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R4 | W | 5-4 RET | ||
L | 6-1 6-2 | |||
R4 | W | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
W | 6-3 6-0 | |||
SF | L | 6-4 1-6 7-6 | ||
A. Frazier Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 7-6(7) | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | ||

K. D. Krumm vs A. Frazier Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.75% (237/98) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.19% (480/331) |
| 65.54% (504/265) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.88% (1058/802) |
| 56.47% (3940/3037) | Games Win/Loss | 52.57% (8978/8101) |
| 75.35% (107/35) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.38% (289/167) |
| 70.91% (39/16) | Clay Win/Loss | 47.62% (40/44) |
| 59.46% (22/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54.96% (72/59) |
| 61.90% (13/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 49.02% (25/26) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 46 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.03 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 262 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 254.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 317.37 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 60% (1622/2710) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (980/1622) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (471/1103) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (160/348) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 45% (1218/2698) |
| 67.50% (27/13) | Slam W/L | 47.87% (45/49) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 46.43% (26/30) |
| 64.29% (9/5) | Cups W/L | 100.00% (2/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 60.23% (156/103) |
| 92.86% (26/2) | Challenger W/L | 77.27% (34/10) |
| 69.62% (55/24) | Futures W/L | 60.67% (54/35) |
| 70% (234/332) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (474/804) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 65% (11/17) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (47/91) |
| 66% (69/104) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (138/241) |
| 93% (214/198) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (462/401) |
| 7% (214/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (462/61) |
| 31% (119/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (347/77) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sat, 29 Nov, 05:00 PM
PredictionSat, 29 Nov, 06:30 PM
PredictionSat, 29 Nov, 05:00 PM
PredictionSat, 29 Nov, 02:50 PM
PredictionSat, 29 Nov, 03:30 PM
PredictionSat, 29 Nov, 07:00 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Betting Tips & Picks November 28, 2025

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Alafia Ayeni Prediction – ATP Temuco Challenger – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

27 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →James Duckworth vs Rio Noguchi Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 28th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
14:00
H2H 0-0
18:30
H2H 0-0
20:00
H2H 0-0
21:30
H2H 0-0
06:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Athens Challenger
Greece
Bogota Challenger
Colombia
Islamabad Challenger
Pakistan
Maia Challenger
Portugal
Manama 2 Challenger
Bahrain
Playford Challenger
Australia
Temuco Challenger
Chile
M15 La Paz
Bolivia
M15 Madrid
Spain
M15 Ribeirao Preto
Brazil
M15 Santiago
Chile
M25 Hradec Kralove
Czech Republic
M25 Luanda
Angola